Comments on: Super Girls Gone Wild! http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/ Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:08:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: Al Schroeder III http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-16705 Al Schroeder III Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:04:15 +0000 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-16705 I'm pretty sure it WAS Bob Haney who wrote that little "gem". I’m pretty sure it WAS Bob Haney who wrote that little “gem”.

]]> By: one diverse comic book nation » THE SHORT STACK: Diversity On The ‘Net - January 4, 2007 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4525 one diverse comic book nation » THE SHORT STACK: Diversity On The ‘Net - January 4, 2007 Sat, 06 Jan 2007 06:21:36 +0000 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4525 [...] Super Girls Gone Wild - The Keeper from Fortress of Fortitude parties like its 1999 with Supergirl and Wonder Woman (from Fortress of Fortitude) [...] [...] Super Girls Gone Wild - The Keeper from Fortress of Fortitude parties like its 1999 with Supergirl and Wonder Woman (from Fortress of Fortitude) [...]

]]> By: Supergirl: Maid of Might Blog » Supergirl #12 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4452 Supergirl: Maid of Might Blog » Supergirl #12 Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:46:13 +0000 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4452 [...] opinion on this issue can be summed up in a comment I made on Fortress of Fortitude: Apart from the (adorable) art, this issue of Supergirl (#12) was no great shakes, but compared to [...] [...] opinion on this issue can be summed up in a comment I made on Fortress of Fortitude: Apart from the (adorable) art, this issue of Supergirl (#12) was no great shakes, but compared to [...]

]]> By: Michelle http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4451 Michelle Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:36:43 +0000 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4451 Er, that should read "this issue of Supergirl (#12) was no great shakes, but compared to the toxic waste dump that was #11, it’s comics GOLD. It also makes the sudden jump in behavior between #10 and #11" etc. Er, that should read “this issue of Supergirl (#12) was no great shakes, but compared to the toxic waste dump that was #11, it’s comics GOLD. It also makes the sudden jump in behavior between #10 and #11″ etc.

]]> By: Michelle http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4450 Michelle Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:14:12 +0000 http://fortressofortitude.wordpress.com/2006/12/31/super-girls-gone-wild/#comment-4450 The more things change, the more they stay the same...at least in comics! Thanks for the comment on my blog. I'm afraid it got lost in a deluge of spam so I only just found it today. Apart from the (adorable) art, this issue of Supergirl (#13) was no great shakes, but compared to the toxic waste dump that was #12, it's comics GOLD. It also makes the sudden jump in behavior between #11 and #12 make a lot more sense, which makes me wonder why they published the "Sharks 'n' Lolipron" story *before* Super Girls Just Wanna Have Fun. The more things change, the more they stay the same…at least in comics!

Thanks for the comment on my blog. I’m afraid it got lost in a deluge of spam so I only just found it today.

Apart from the (adorable) art, this issue of Supergirl (#13) was no great shakes, but compared to the toxic waste dump that was #12, it’s comics GOLD. It also makes the sudden jump in behavior between #11 and #12 make a lot more sense, which makes me wonder why they published the “Sharks ‘n’ Lolipron” story *before* Super Girls Just Wanna Have Fun.

]]>